Professionalization of Political Campaigns: Roadmap for the Analysis

Keywords: Political campaigns, Professionalization, Process tracing, Party politics

Abstract

Political parties in developed democracies have undergone deep inner transformation processes brought about by changes in voting behaviour of their electorates, fragmentation of media landscape, and technological revolution. Such changes have caused that the topic of political party transformation has become a central focus of current political science research. However, only a few works have addressed specific aspects of these far-reaching transformations, that is the process of modernisation and professionalization of political campaigns. Specifically, the recent research on professionalization of electoral campaigns has focused primarily on measurement of the index of professionalization, which is suitable for comparative research. Yet deep understanding of the process itself has been still absent, and therefore, this research paper aspires to cover this gap. Main goal of this paper is to offer a roadmap for analysis of professionalization of electoral campaigns with focus on qualitative studies. It represents a causal mechanism of professionalization of electoral campaigns, including the identification of internal and external factors and possible framework conditions that contribute to it (i.e. professionalization), through the process of tracing method (i.e. the causal mechanism is built on the basis of the process tracing method). Here, external factors are defined as environmental conditions, which include declining voter turnout, declining party identification, increasing electoral volatility, and declining interest in political party membership. Although their effect is considered a long-term one, the causal mechanism assumes their influence on the triggering of other processes: external shock (electoral win or loss) and internal shock (change of leader). In the next part of the causal mechanism, subsequent internal processes are expected in the form of changes to the primary goal and organizational structure of parties. Unlike previously published works on this topic, this paper suggests that not only the specific internal and external factors or amount of invested financial resources affect the degree of professionalization, but also the party's market orientation and the level of its internal discipline.

References

BEACH, D., PEDERSEN, R. B. (2011). What is Process-Tracing Actually Tracing? The Three Variants of Process Tracing Methods and Their Uses and Limitations. In: APSA 2011 Annual Meeting. [online], 35 pp. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1902082#references-widget [Accessed 18.4.2021]
BEACH, D., PEDERSEN, R. B. (2016). Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines For Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. University of Michigan Press, 2016. 398 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6576809
BÉRTOA, F. C., RAMA, J. (2020). Party decline or social transformation? Economic, institutional and sociological change and the rise of anti-political-establishment parties in Western Europe. In: European Political Science Review. Vol. 12, No. 4, 2020. pp. 503-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000260.
BIEZEN VAN, I., POGUNTKE, T. (2014). The decline of membership-based politics. In: Party Politics. Vol. 20, No. 2, 2014. pp. 205-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519969.
BLATTER, J., HAVERLAND, M. (2014) Case Studies and (Causal-) Process Tracing. In: ENGELI, I., ALLISON, C.R. (eds) Comparative Policy Studies. Research Methods Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137314154_4.
BOWLER, S., FARRELL, D.M. (1992). Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. 245 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22411-1.
DALTON, R. 2016. Party Identification and Its Implications. In. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. [online]. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.72.
DENVER, D., HANDS, G., FISHER, J., MACALLISTER, I. (2003). Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992-2001: Centralization and Modernization. In: Party Politics. Vol. 9, No. 5, 2003. pp. 541-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688030095002.
FAGAN, A., KOPECKÝ, P. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics. Routledge, 2018. 370 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687681.
FARRELL, D. (1996). Campaign Strategies and Tactics. In: LEDUC, L., NIEMI, R. G., NORRIS, P. (eds) Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Sage Publication, 1996. 440 pp.
GIBSON, R., K., RÖMMELE, A. (2001). Changing Campaign Communications: A Party-Centered Theory of Professionalized Campaigning. In: The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2001. pp. 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/108118001129172323.
GERBER, A. S., GREEN, D. P. (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. In: American Political Science Review. Vol. 94, No. 3, 2000. pp. 653 - 663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2585837.
GIBSON, R., K., RÖMMELE, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. In: Party Politics. Vol. 15, 2009. pp. 265-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245.
GLENNAN, S. (1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. In: Erkenntnis. Vol. 44, No. 1, 1996. pp. 49-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172853.
GOLDSTEIN, K. M., RIDOUT, T. N. (2002). The politics of participation: Mobilization and turnout over time. In: Political Behavior. Vol. 24, No.1, 2002. pp. 3-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020930604938.
HARMEL, R., JANDA, K. (1994) An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics. Vol. 6, No. 3, 1994. pp. 259-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006003001.
HARROP, M. (1990). Political Marketing. In: Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 43, No. 3, 1990. pp. 277-291.
LINEK, L., PECHÁČEK, Š. (2005). K důvodům nízkého počtu členů českých politických stran. In: MANSFELDOVÁ, Z., KROUPA, A. (eds.) Participace a zájmové organizace v České republice. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství SLON, 2005. 244 pp.
LISI, M. (2013). The Professionalization of Campaigns in Recent Democracies: The Portuguese Case. In: European Journal of Communication. Vol. 28, No. 3, 2013. pp. 259-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113475463.
KAVANAGH, D. (1996). New Campaign Communications: Consequences for British Political parties. In: Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. Vol. 1, No. 3, 1996. pp. 60-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X96001003006.
LEES-MARSHMENT, J. (2001). The product, sales and market-oriented party - How Labour learnt to market the product, not just the presentation. In: European Journal of Marketing. Vol. 35, No. 9-10, 2001. pp. 1074-1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005959.
LILLEKER, D. G., NEGRINE, R. (2002) Professionalization: Of What? Since When? By Whom?" In: Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002. pp. 98-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/108118002236354.
MAIR, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: the Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso, 2013. 160 pp.
MAINWARING, S., GERVASONI, C., ESPAÑA-NAJERA, A. (2017). Extra- and within-system electoral volatility. In: Party Politics. Vol. 23, No. 6, 2017. pp. 623-635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815625229.
MANCINI, P. (1999). New Frontiers in Political Professionalism. In: Political Communication. Vol. 16, 1999. pp. 231-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198604.
NORRIS, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge University Press, 2000. 420 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343.
PUNTON, M., WELLE, K. (2015). Straws-in-the-wind, Hoops and Smoking Guns: What can Process Tracing Offer to Impact Evaluation? In: CDI Practice Paper 10. Brighton: IDS.
RAHAT, G., KENIG, O. (2018). From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford University Press, 2018. 400 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198808008.001.0001.
RESTREPO-ECHAVARRÍA, N. J., RODRÍGUEZ-DÍAZ, R., CASTROMIL, A. R. (2018). Proposal of an indicator to measure the professionalization of election campaigns: The case of Colombia. In: Profesional de la Informacion, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2018. pp. 289-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.07.
SARTORI, G. (1970). Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. In: American Political Science Review. Vol.64, No. 4, 1970. pp. 1033-1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356.
SCAMMEL, M. (1995). Designer Politics. How Elections Are Won. Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 342 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23942-9.
SOLIJONOV, A. (2016). Voter Turnout Trends around the World. IDEA, 2016. 54 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rwm3.20358.
STRÖMBÄCK, J. (2007). Political Marketing and Professionalized Campaigning. In: Journal of Political Marketing. Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 2007. pp.49-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v06n02_04.
STRÖMBÄCK, J. (2009). Selective Professionalisation of Political Campaigning: A Test of the Party-Centred Theory of Professionalised Campaigning in the Context of the 2006 Swedish Election. In: Political Studies. Vol. 57, 2009. pp. 95-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00727.x.
TENSCHER, J., MYKKÄNEN, J. (2014). Two Levels of Campaigning: An Empirical Test of the Party-Centred Theory of Professionalisation. In: Political Studies. Vol. 62, 2014. pp. 20-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12104.
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Ostrá, D. (2021, June 30). Professionalization of Political Campaigns: Roadmap for the Analysis. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 21(1). Retrieved from http://sjps.fsvucm.sk/index.php/sjps/article/view/219