Participatory Budgeting and Traditional Participation in Czech Municipalities

Pavol Minárik

Authors

Pavol Minárik The Faculty of Social and Economic Studies of the Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

Keywords:

Participatory budgeting, Political participation, Municipal elections, Voter turnout, Political competition, Czech Republic

Abstract

As an instrument of smart governance, participatory budgeting has been implemented by several dozen of municipalities in the Czech Republic. This is in line with the trend in many European cities. The paper examines the implementation of participatory budgeting in Czech municipalities. It is observed that participatory budgeting is being implemented in the Czech Republic typically on a very limited scale. The particular aim of this paper is to analyze the relation of participatory budgeting to the traditional political participation in local elections. Following an examination of the extent in which the instrument is implemented in the Czech municipalities, statistical tools are used to relate implementation of participatory budgeting to several measures of traditional political participation, such as voter turnout and intensity of the political competition in municipal elections. The paper concludes that the implementation of participatory budgeting has very little relation to the traditional, electoral participation in the Czech Republic.

References

AGORA CE (2017). Úspěchy participativního rozpočtování v ČR v roce 2016. In: Participativní rozpočet. [online]. Available at: <https://www.participativni-rozpocet.cz/blog/2017/05/02/uspechy-participativniho-rozpoctovani-v-cr-v-roce-2016/>. [Accessed 5 Aug 2019].
Agora CE (2020). Participativní rozpočty v České republice v roce 2019. [online]. Available at: <https://www.participativni-rozpocet.cz/blog/2020/02/07/participativni-rozpocty-v-ceske-republice-v-roce-2019/>. [Accessed 7 Apr 2020].
AVRITZER, L. (2006). New public spheres in Brazil: local democracy and deliberative politics. In: International journal of urban and regional research. Vol. 30, No. 3, 2006, pp. 623–37.
BASSOLI, M. (2012). Participatory budgeting in Italy: An analysis of (almost democratic) participatory governance arrangements. In: International journal of urban and regional research. Vol. 36, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1183–1203.
BERNARD, J. (2013). Kompletní jmenná databáze kandidátů do zastupitelstev měst a obcí jako nástroj pro výzkum populace kandidátů a zastupitelů. In: Acta politologica. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2013, pp. 82–93.
CABANNES, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. In: Environment and urbanization. Vol. 16, No. 1, 2004, pp. 27–46.
ČERNÝ, V. (2016). Metodika tvorby participativního rozpočtu pro města v ČR. Praha: Agora CE, 2016.
DE SOUSA SANTOS, B. (1998). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy. In: Politics & Society. Vol. 26, No. 4, 1998, pp. 461–510.
HURTIKOVA, H., SOUKOP, M. (2019). Participative and Deliberative Democracy on the Local Level: How the Political Characteristics of Municipalities in the Czech Republic Relate to the Use of Selected Democratic Innovation within their Territory?. In: Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government. Vol. 17, No 2, 2019, pp. 369–393.
LAAKSO, M., TAAGEPERA, R. (1979). “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. In: Comparative political studies. Vol. 12, No. 1, 1979, pp. 3–27.
LINEK, L., PETRÚŠEK, L. (2018). Vývoj vzdělanostních nerovností v účasti na politice v Česku a na Slovensku a jejich důsledky pro reprezentaci postojů. In: Sociológia. Vol. 50, No. 5, 2018, pp. 524–549.
MIČKA, P. ed. (2016). Analýza občanské participace v ČR. Praha: Agora CE, 2016.
MINARIK, P. (2019). Participatory budgeting in the Czech Republic: An instrument turned into an ornament. In: SOLIMAN, K. S., (ed.). Proceedings of the 34th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Madrid: IBIMA, 2019, pp. 2432–2439.
NORTHMORE-BALL, K. (2016). Increasingly unequal turnout in Eastern European new democracies: Communist and transitional legacies versus new institutions. In: Electoral Studies. Vol. 42, 2016, pp. 188–200.
PEIXOTO, T. (2012). Participatory Budgeting: Seven Defining Characteristics. In: DemocracySpot. [online]. Available at <https://democracyspot.net/2012/09/12/participatory-budgeting-seven-defining-characteristics/>. [Accessed 15 Jul 2019].
SCHNEIDER, A., & GOLDFRANK, B. (2002). Budgets and ballots in Brazil: participatory budgeting from the city to the state. IDS Working Paper 149. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2002.
SILVER, H., SCOTT, A., KAZEPOV, Y. (2010). Participation in urban contention and deliberation. In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 34, No. 3, 2010, pp. 453–477.
SINTOMER, Y., HERZBERG, C., and RÖCKE, A. (2008). Participatory budgeting in Europe: potentials and challenges. In: International journal of urban and regional research. Vol. 32, No. 1, 2008, pp. 164–178.
SINTOMER, Y., HERZBERG, C., RÖCKE, A., ALLEGRETTI, G. (2012). Transnational models of citizen participation: the case of participatory budgeting. In: Journal of Public Deliberation. Vol. 8, No. 2, 2012, Article 9.
SOUZA, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. In: Environment and Urbanization. Vol. 13, No. 1, 2001, pp. 159–184.
TALPIN, J. (2011). Schools of democracy: How ordinary citizens (sometimes) become competent in participatory budgeting institutions. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2011.
VRÁBLÍKOVÁ, K. (2009). Politická participace a její determinanty v postkomunistických zemích. In: Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review. Vol. 45, No. 5, 2009, pp 867–897.
WAMPLER, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting. In: SHAH, A. (ed.). Participatory budgeting. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2007. pp. 21–54.