The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats
A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.230102Keywords:
EU, NATO, Hybrid Threats, Cooperation, Ukraine, InstitutionalismAbstract
The annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the violation of the territorial integrity of Ukraine by the Russian Federation provided new impetus for the EU and NATO to develop and later also intensify cooperation in hybrid threats. This unique process, that happens between two actors who have different histories, aims or membership structures, is analysed from the institutionalist perspective, which served as a framework to understand the development. The main aim of the article is to assess interinstitutional cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of hybrid threats: especially in the area of capacity building, strategic communication, crisis management, counterterrorism or WMD use, and civil protection. The author concludes that both the EU and NATO successfully developed cooperation in hybrid threats and created mechanisms that enable similar perceptions of the threats and better coordination of the responses. The article serves merely as an exploratory study dedicated to the development of cooperation between the EU and NATO in this challenging area in the period between 2014 and 2022.
References
ABRUTYN, S. and TURNER, J. H. (2011). The Old Institutionalism Meets the New Institutionalism. In: Sociological Perspectives. Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 283-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.283.
AGGESTAM, L. and HYDE-PRICE, A. (2019). Double Trouble: Trum, Transatlantic Relations and European Strategic Autonomy. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 57, Vol. S1, pp. 114-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12948.
ALDRICH, R. J. (2004). Transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation. In: International Affairs. Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 731-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00413.x.
ALVESSON, M. and SPICER, A. (2019). Neo-Institutional Theory and Organization Studies: A Mid-Life Crisis? In: Organization Studies. Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 199-218. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0170840618772610.
ANDERSON, S. (1995). EU, NATO, and CSCE responses to the Yugoslav crisis: Testing Europe's new security architecture. In: European security. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 328-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839508407222.
ANTONENKO, O. (1999). Russia, NATO and European security after Kosovo. In: Survival. Vol. 41 No .4, pp. 124-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713660137.
BARRINHA, A. (2018). Virtual Neighbors: Russia and the EU in Cyberspace. In: Insight Turkey. Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 29–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0021.
BECHEV, D. (2006). Carrots, sticks and norms: the EU and regional cooperation in Southeast Europe. In: Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595515.
BOEKE, S. (2018). National cyber crisis management: Different European approaches. In: Governance. Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 449–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12309.
BOSSONG, R. (2012). The evolution of EU counter-terrorism : European security policy after 9/11. New York: Routledge, 194 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084694.
CARRAPICO, H., BARRINHA, A. (2017). The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1254-1272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12575.
CLADI, L. and LOCATELLI, A. (2020). Keep Calm and Carry On (Differently): NATO and CSDP after Brexit. In: Global Policy. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12747.
CORNISH, P. and EDWARDS, G. (2001). Beyond the EU/NATO dichotomy: the beginnings of a European strategic culture. In: International Affairs. Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 587-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00208.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2018). EU HEL-ML 18 (PACE) European Union Hybrid Exercise Multilayer 18 (Parallel and Coordinated Exercise) Exercise Instructions (EXINST). Public version [online]. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13577-2018-INIT/en/pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
DIESEN, G. (2016). EU and NATO relations with Russia: After the collapse of the Soviet Union. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580609.
DUKE, S. W. (2019). The Competing Logics of EU Security and Defence. In. Survival. Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589092.
EEAS. (2022). EU INTEGRATED RESOLVE 2022 EU IR22: Parallel and Coordinated Exercise (PACE). European External Action Service, 25. 7. 2022. [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-integrated-resolve-2022-eu-ir22-parallel-and-coordinated-exercisespace_en [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016). FAQ: Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats. Brussels, 6. 4. 2016 [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/it/MEMO_16_1250 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016). Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats. A European Response. Brussels, 6. 4. 2016 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016JC0018&from=EN [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2017). rescEU: European Commission proposes to strenghten EU disaster management: Questions and Answers. [online]. European Commission, 23. 11. 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_17_4732 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2018). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Action Plan against Disinformation. Brussels, 5. 12. 2018. [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/action_plan_against_disinformation.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. (2016). Joint Declaration by The President of the European Council, The President of the European Commission, and The Secretary general of the Norh Atlantic Treaty Organization. [online]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21481/nato-eu-declaration-8-july-en-final.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. (2018). Third progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35578/third-report-ue-nato-layout-en.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY. (2018). 2018 CDP Revision. The EU Capability Development Priorities. [online]. Available at: https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/eda-publications/eda-brochure-cdp [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUVSDISINFO. (2023). Searched the term „NATO“. [online]. Available at: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/ [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EVERA, S. V. (1991). Primed for Peace: Europe After the Cold War. In: International Security. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 7-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538906.
EWERS-PETERS, N. M. (2021). Brexit's implications for EU-NATO cooperation: Transatlantic bridge no more? In: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 576-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120963814.
FILIPEC, O. (2017). (In)efficiency of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: Ukraine, Brexit, Trump and beyond. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 17, No. 3, 4 pp. 279-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjps-2017-0012.
FILIPEC, O. (2018). Europeanization of FDI Screening: What Model for the EU and its Member States? In: New Perspectives on Political Economy. Vol. 14, No. 1-2, pp. 21-50.
FORSBERG, T. and VAAHTORANTA, T. (2001). Inside the EU, outside NATO: Paradoxes of Finland's and Sweden's post‐neutrality. In: European Security. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 68-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830108407483.
FORSVARET. (2021). Klar til å gi kommandoen videre. Lars Hallingstorp, 29. 1. 2021 [online]. Available at: https://www.forsvaret.no/aktuelt-og-presse/aktuelt/sjef-foh-jakobsen?q=trident%20juncture [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
GIUGLIETTI, L. (2022). From the Gulf of Aden to the Mediterranean Sea: The Institutionalisation of EU-NATO Maritime Relations. In: COSTA, O. and HENCKE, S. Van (eds.). The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections. Palgrave Studies in European Integration Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 455-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12338-2_21.
GÜVENÇ, S. and ÖZEL, S. (2017). NATO and Turkey in the post-Cold War world: between abandonment and entrapment. In: NATO's First Enlargement. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 77-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545783-19.
HEATH, R. (2017). Federica Mogherini “soft” on disinformation, critics say. In: Politico. 22. 3. 2017 [online]. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/vladimir-putin-opponents-pile-onto-federica-mogherini-eaststratcom-sandra-kalniete-jakub-janda-estonia-atlantic-council-ben-nimmo-fake-news-russia-putin-europe-foreign-policy/ [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HIGGINS, E. (2021). We Are Bellingcat: An Intelligence Agency for the People. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 272 pp.
HOFMANN, S. C. (2009). Overlapping institutions in the realm of international security: The case of NATO and ESDP. In: Perspectives on politics. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090070.
HOWORTH, J. (2019). Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: A Win-Win Approach. In: L'Europe en Formation. Vol. 389, No. 2, pp. 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.389.0085.
HOWORTH, J., KEELER, J. T. S. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy. In: Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981363_1.
HUNTER, R. E. (2002). The European Security and Defense Policy. NATO's Companion -or Competitor? Pittsburgh: Rand, 179 pp.
HYBRID COE. (2017). Memorandum of understanding on The European Centre of Excellence For Countering Hybrid Threats. [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Hybrid-CoE-final-Mou-110417-1.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYBRID COE. (2020). Hybrid Warfare: Future & Technologies (HYFUTEC). [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/20200915_HYFUTEC_info.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYBRID COE. (2023). The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. Dates of accession for the Hybrid CoE Participating States. [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Hybrid_CoE_Participating-states_IRE.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYDE-PRICE, A. (2000). Germany and European order: Enlarging NATO and the EU. Manchester University Press, 2000.
KAY, S. (1998). NATO and the Future of European Security. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
KEOHANE, R. O., NYE, J. S. and HOFFMAN, S. (1997). After the Cold war. International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989-1991. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
KEYPOUR, J. (2022). European Union Energy Security: Constructing a “Shelter” for Small States' Energy Security Preservation. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 48-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.220103.
KINGDON, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 240 pp.
KOELBLE, T. A. (1995). The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. In: Comparative Politics. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 231–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422167.
KOOPS, J. A. (2020). Theorising inter-organisational relations: the "EU-NATO relationship" as a catalytic case study. In: EU-NATO Relations. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 13-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454462-2.
KYDD, A. (2001). Trust building, trust breaking: the dilemma of NATO enlargement. In: International Organization. Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 801-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193600.
LÉTÉ, B. (2019). Cooperation in cyberspace. NATO and the EU: The essential partners. NATO Defence College [online]. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep19964.9.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
LIGHT, M., WHITE, S. and LÖWENHARDT, J. (2000). A wider Europe: the view from Moscow and Kyiv. In: International Affairs. Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 77-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00121.
LIJPHART, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. In: American Political Science Review. Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 682-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513.
MARCH, J. G. and OLSEN, J. P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. In: The American Political Science Review. Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 734-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840.
MARTILL, B. and SUS, M. (2018). Post-Brexit EU/UK security cooperation: NATO, CSDP+, or 'French connection'?. In: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 846-863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118796979.
MENON, A. (1995). From independence to cooperation: France, NATO and European security. In: International Affairs. Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2624008.
MÉRAND, F. (2006). NATO, ESDP, and Transatlantic Security: Where Does Canada Fit?. In: Studia Diplomatica. pp. 141-148.
MISSIROLI, A. (2002). EU-NATO cooperation in crisis management: No Turkish delight for ESDP. In: Security dialogue. Vol, 33, No. 1, pp. 9-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010602033001002.
MULLETI, N. (2023). EU-NATO Cooperation in the Area of Crisis Management: Case of Kosovo. In: European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejels-2023-0009.
NATO ENERGY SECURITY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE. (2017). Annual NATO Roundtable on Energy Security 2017. [online]. Available at: https://enseccoe.org/en/newsroom/annual-nato-roundtable-on-energy-security-2017/300 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2017). Second progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_06/20170619_170614-Joint-progress-report-EU-NATO-EN.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2019). Fourth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2019_06/190617-4th-Joint-progress-report-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2020). Fifth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/6/pdf/200615-progress-report-nr5-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2021). Sixth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/6/pdf/210603-progress-report-nr6-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2022). Seventh progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220620-progress-report-nr7-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
PERRIN, J-E. (2022). The development of a europdefenseence and its relations with NATO. In: Diritto costituzionale. Vol. 1, pp. 49-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/DC2022-001003.
PETRESCU, E. D. (2022). Hybrid threats: An Avenue for a more solid NATO-EU cooperation. In: Atlantic Forum. 1. 9. 2022 [online]. Available at: https://www.atlantic-forum.com/atlantica/hybrid-threats-an-avenue-for-a-more-solid-nato-eu-cooperation [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
POPTCHEV, P. (2000). NATO-EU Cooperation in Cybersecurity and Cyber Defence Offers Unrivalled Advantages. In: Information & Security: An International Journal. Vol. 45, pp. 35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.4503.
PRIOR, T. (2017). NATO: Pushing Boundaries for Resilience. In: CSS Analyses in security Policy. No. 213, September 2017. [online]. Available at: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CSSAnalyse213-EN.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
PUCHALA, D. J. (1999). Institutionalism, Intergrovernmentalism and European Integration. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 317-331.
Quotes.pub. (2023). Oscar Wilde. [online]. Available at: https://quotes.pub/search [Accessed 25. 7. 2023].
REICHARD, M. (2006). The EU-NATO Relationship: A Legal and Political Perspective (1st ed.). New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616322.
RINGSMOSE, J. and WEBBER, M. (2020). Hedging their bets? The case for a European pillar in NATO. In: Defence Studies. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 295-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1823835.
RONTOYANNI, C. (2002). So far, so good? Russia and the ESDP. In: International Affairs. Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 813-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00281.
RUSNÁKOVÁ, S. (2017). Russian New Art of Hybrid Warfare in Ukraine. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 17, No. 3, 4, pp. 343-380.
SCHMIDT, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. In: Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11, No 1, pp. 303-326.
SCHREER, B. (2019). Trump, NATO and the Future of Europe's Defence. In: The RUSI Journal. Vol. 164, No. 1, pp. 10-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1605011.
SHAKE, K. (1998). NATO after the Cold War, 1991-1995: Institutional Competition and the Collapse of the French Alternative. In: Contemporary European History. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 379-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777300004306.
SHEA, J. (2020). European Defence After Brexit: A Plus or a Minus? In: European View. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685820921617.
SLOAN, S. R. (2005). NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
SMITH, J. S. (2011). EU-NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue?, In: European Security. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 243-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2011.557771.
SNYDER, T. (2022). Ukraine Holds the Future. The War Between Democracy and Nihilism. In: Foreign Affairs. September/October 2022. [online]. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/ukraine-war-democracy-nihilism-timothy-snyder [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
SPERLING, J. and KIRCHNER, E. (1998). Economic security and the problem of cooperation in post-Cold War Europe. In: Review of International Studies. Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598002216.
STASZCZYK, A. (2019). European Parliament Position on EU Cyber Security and Defense Policy. In: Reality of Politics. Vol. 10, pp. 122–133.
SVEDSEN, Ø. (2019). Brexit and the future of EU defence: a practice approach to differentiated defense integration. In: Journal of European Integration. Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 993-1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1622540.
TICHÝ, L. (2016). The EU Integration Discourse in the Energy Relations with Russia. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 60-85.
YIN, R. K. (2009). Case study Research: design and methods. Applied social research methods series. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
AGGESTAM, L. and HYDE-PRICE, A. (2019). Double Trouble: Trum, Transatlantic Relations and European Strategic Autonomy. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 57, Vol. S1, pp. 114-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12948.
ALDRICH, R. J. (2004). Transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation. In: International Affairs. Vol. 80, No. 4, pp. 731-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00413.x.
ALVESSON, M. and SPICER, A. (2019). Neo-Institutional Theory and Organization Studies: A Mid-Life Crisis? In: Organization Studies. Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 199-218. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0170840618772610.
ANDERSON, S. (1995). EU, NATO, and CSCE responses to the Yugoslav crisis: Testing Europe's new security architecture. In: European security. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 328-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839508407222.
ANTONENKO, O. (1999). Russia, NATO and European security after Kosovo. In: Survival. Vol. 41 No .4, pp. 124-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713660137.
BARRINHA, A. (2018). Virtual Neighbors: Russia and the EU in Cyberspace. In: Insight Turkey. Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 29–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0021.
BECHEV, D. (2006). Carrots, sticks and norms: the EU and regional cooperation in Southeast Europe. In: Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595515.
BOEKE, S. (2018). National cyber crisis management: Different European approaches. In: Governance. Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 449–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12309.
BOSSONG, R. (2012). The evolution of EU counter-terrorism : European security policy after 9/11. New York: Routledge, 194 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084694.
CARRAPICO, H., BARRINHA, A. (2017). The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?. In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1254-1272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12575.
CLADI, L. and LOCATELLI, A. (2020). Keep Calm and Carry On (Differently): NATO and CSDP after Brexit. In: Global Policy. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12747.
CORNISH, P. and EDWARDS, G. (2001). Beyond the EU/NATO dichotomy: the beginnings of a European strategic culture. In: International Affairs. Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 587-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00208.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2018). EU HEL-ML 18 (PACE) European Union Hybrid Exercise Multilayer 18 (Parallel and Coordinated Exercise) Exercise Instructions (EXINST). Public version [online]. Available at: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13577-2018-INIT/en/pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
DIESEN, G. (2016). EU and NATO relations with Russia: After the collapse of the Soviet Union. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580609.
DUKE, S. W. (2019). The Competing Logics of EU Security and Defence. In. Survival. Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2019.1589092.
EEAS. (2022). EU INTEGRATED RESOLVE 2022 EU IR22: Parallel and Coordinated Exercise (PACE). European External Action Service, 25. 7. 2022. [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eu-integrated-resolve-2022-eu-ir22-parallel-and-coordinated-exercisespace_en [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016). FAQ: Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats. Brussels, 6. 4. 2016 [online]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/it/MEMO_16_1250 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2016). Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. Joint Framework on countering hybrid threats. A European Response. Brussels, 6. 4. 2016 [online]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016JC0018&from=EN [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2017). rescEU: European Commission proposes to strenghten EU disaster management: Questions and Answers. [online]. European Commission, 23. 11. 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_17_4732 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2018). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Action Plan against Disinformation. Brussels, 5. 12. 2018. [online]. Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/action_plan_against_disinformation.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. (2016). Joint Declaration by The President of the European Council, The President of the European Commission, and The Secretary general of the Norh Atlantic Treaty Organization. [online]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21481/nato-eu-declaration-8-july-en-final.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN COUNCIL. (2018). Third progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35578/third-report-ue-nato-layout-en.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUROPEAN DEFENCE AGENCY. (2018). 2018 CDP Revision. The EU Capability Development Priorities. [online]. Available at: https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/eda-publications/eda-brochure-cdp [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EUVSDISINFO. (2023). Searched the term „NATO“. [online]. Available at: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/ [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
EVERA, S. V. (1991). Primed for Peace: Europe After the Cold War. In: International Security. Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 7-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538906.
EWERS-PETERS, N. M. (2021). Brexit's implications for EU-NATO cooperation: Transatlantic bridge no more? In: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 576-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120963814.
FILIPEC, O. (2017). (In)efficiency of EU Common Foreign and Security Policy: Ukraine, Brexit, Trump and beyond. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 17, No. 3, 4 pp. 279-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjps-2017-0012.
FILIPEC, O. (2018). Europeanization of FDI Screening: What Model for the EU and its Member States? In: New Perspectives on Political Economy. Vol. 14, No. 1-2, pp. 21-50.
FORSBERG, T. and VAAHTORANTA, T. (2001). Inside the EU, outside NATO: Paradoxes of Finland's and Sweden's post‐neutrality. In: European Security. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 68-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830108407483.
FORSVARET. (2021). Klar til å gi kommandoen videre. Lars Hallingstorp, 29. 1. 2021 [online]. Available at: https://www.forsvaret.no/aktuelt-og-presse/aktuelt/sjef-foh-jakobsen?q=trident%20juncture [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
GIUGLIETTI, L. (2022). From the Gulf of Aden to the Mediterranean Sea: The Institutionalisation of EU-NATO Maritime Relations. In: COSTA, O. and HENCKE, S. Van (eds.). The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections. Palgrave Studies in European Integration Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 455-478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12338-2_21.
GÜVENÇ, S. and ÖZEL, S. (2017). NATO and Turkey in the post-Cold War world: between abandonment and entrapment. In: NATO's First Enlargement. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 77-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315545783-19.
HEATH, R. (2017). Federica Mogherini “soft” on disinformation, critics say. In: Politico. 22. 3. 2017 [online]. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/vladimir-putin-opponents-pile-onto-federica-mogherini-eaststratcom-sandra-kalniete-jakub-janda-estonia-atlantic-council-ben-nimmo-fake-news-russia-putin-europe-foreign-policy/ [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HIGGINS, E. (2021). We Are Bellingcat: An Intelligence Agency for the People. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 272 pp.
HOFMANN, S. C. (2009). Overlapping institutions in the realm of international security: The case of NATO and ESDP. In: Perspectives on politics. Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090070.
HOWORTH, J. (2019). Strategic Autonomy and EU-NATO Cooperation: A Win-Win Approach. In: L'Europe en Formation. Vol. 389, No. 2, pp. 85-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/eufor.389.0085.
HOWORTH, J., KEELER, J. T. S. (2003). The EU, NATO and the Quest for European Autonomy. In: Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981363_1.
HUNTER, R. E. (2002). The European Security and Defense Policy. NATO's Companion -or Competitor? Pittsburgh: Rand, 179 pp.
HYBRID COE. (2017). Memorandum of understanding on The European Centre of Excellence For Countering Hybrid Threats. [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Hybrid-CoE-final-Mou-110417-1.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYBRID COE. (2020). Hybrid Warfare: Future & Technologies (HYFUTEC). [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/20200915_HYFUTEC_info.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYBRID COE. (2023). The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. Dates of accession for the Hybrid CoE Participating States. [online]. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Hybrid_CoE_Participating-states_IRE.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
HYDE-PRICE, A. (2000). Germany and European order: Enlarging NATO and the EU. Manchester University Press, 2000.
KAY, S. (1998). NATO and the Future of European Security. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
KEOHANE, R. O., NYE, J. S. and HOFFMAN, S. (1997). After the Cold war. International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989-1991. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
KEYPOUR, J. (2022). European Union Energy Security: Constructing a “Shelter” for Small States' Energy Security Preservation. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 48-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.220103.
KINGDON, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 240 pp.
KOELBLE, T. A. (1995). The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology. In: Comparative Politics. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 231–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422167.
KOOPS, J. A. (2020). Theorising inter-organisational relations: the "EU-NATO relationship" as a catalytic case study. In: EU-NATO Relations. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 13-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429454462-2.
KYDD, A. (2001). Trust building, trust breaking: the dilemma of NATO enlargement. In: International Organization. Vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 801-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193600.
LÉTÉ, B. (2019). Cooperation in cyberspace. NATO and the EU: The essential partners. NATO Defence College [online]. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep19964.9.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
LIGHT, M., WHITE, S. and LÖWENHARDT, J. (2000). A wider Europe: the view from Moscow and Kyiv. In: International Affairs. Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 77-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00121.
LIJPHART, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. In: American Political Science Review. Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 682-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513.
MARCH, J. G. and OLSEN, J. P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. In: The American Political Science Review. Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 734-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840.
MARTILL, B. and SUS, M. (2018). Post-Brexit EU/UK security cooperation: NATO, CSDP+, or 'French connection'?. In: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 846-863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118796979.
MENON, A. (1995). From independence to cooperation: France, NATO and European security. In: International Affairs. Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2624008.
MÉRAND, F. (2006). NATO, ESDP, and Transatlantic Security: Where Does Canada Fit?. In: Studia Diplomatica. pp. 141-148.
MISSIROLI, A. (2002). EU-NATO cooperation in crisis management: No Turkish delight for ESDP. In: Security dialogue. Vol, 33, No. 1, pp. 9-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010602033001002.
MULLETI, N. (2023). EU-NATO Cooperation in the Area of Crisis Management: Case of Kosovo. In: European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ejels-2023-0009.
NATO ENERGY SECURITY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE. (2017). Annual NATO Roundtable on Energy Security 2017. [online]. Available at: https://enseccoe.org/en/newsroom/annual-nato-roundtable-on-energy-security-2017/300 [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2017). Second progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2017_06/20170619_170614-Joint-progress-report-EU-NATO-EN.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2019). Fourth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by NATO and EU Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2019_06/190617-4th-Joint-progress-report-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2020). Fifth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/6/pdf/200615-progress-report-nr5-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2021). Sixth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/6/pdf/210603-progress-report-nr6-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
NATO. (2022). Seventh progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017. [online]. Available at: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/220620-progress-report-nr7-EU-NATO-eng.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
PERRIN, J-E. (2022). The development of a europdefenseence and its relations with NATO. In: Diritto costituzionale. Vol. 1, pp. 49-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/DC2022-001003.
PETRESCU, E. D. (2022). Hybrid threats: An Avenue for a more solid NATO-EU cooperation. In: Atlantic Forum. 1. 9. 2022 [online]. Available at: https://www.atlantic-forum.com/atlantica/hybrid-threats-an-avenue-for-a-more-solid-nato-eu-cooperation [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
POPTCHEV, P. (2000). NATO-EU Cooperation in Cybersecurity and Cyber Defence Offers Unrivalled Advantages. In: Information & Security: An International Journal. Vol. 45, pp. 35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11610/isij.4503.
PRIOR, T. (2017). NATO: Pushing Boundaries for Resilience. In: CSS Analyses in security Policy. No. 213, September 2017. [online]. Available at: https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CSSAnalyse213-EN.pdf [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
PUCHALA, D. J. (1999). Institutionalism, Intergrovernmentalism and European Integration. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 317-331.
Quotes.pub. (2023). Oscar Wilde. [online]. Available at: https://quotes.pub/search [Accessed 25. 7. 2023].
REICHARD, M. (2006). The EU-NATO Relationship: A Legal and Political Perspective (1st ed.). New York and London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616322.
RINGSMOSE, J. and WEBBER, M. (2020). Hedging their bets? The case for a European pillar in NATO. In: Defence Studies. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 295-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2020.1823835.
RONTOYANNI, C. (2002). So far, so good? Russia and the ESDP. In: International Affairs. Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 813-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00281.
RUSNÁKOVÁ, S. (2017). Russian New Art of Hybrid Warfare in Ukraine. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 17, No. 3, 4, pp. 343-380.
SCHMIDT, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. In: Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11, No 1, pp. 303-326.
SCHREER, B. (2019). Trump, NATO and the Future of Europe's Defence. In: The RUSI Journal. Vol. 164, No. 1, pp. 10-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2019.1605011.
SHAKE, K. (1998). NATO after the Cold War, 1991-1995: Institutional Competition and the Collapse of the French Alternative. In: Contemporary European History. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 379-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777300004306.
SHEA, J. (2020). European Defence After Brexit: A Plus or a Minus? In: European View. Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 88-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685820921617.
SLOAN, S. R. (2005). NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic community: the transatlantic bargain challenged. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
SMITH, J. S. (2011). EU-NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue?, In: European Security. Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 243-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2011.557771.
SNYDER, T. (2022). Ukraine Holds the Future. The War Between Democracy and Nihilism. In: Foreign Affairs. September/October 2022. [online]. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/ukraine-war-democracy-nihilism-timothy-snyder [Accessed 5. 5. 2023].
SPERLING, J. and KIRCHNER, E. (1998). Economic security and the problem of cooperation in post-Cold War Europe. In: Review of International Studies. Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 221-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598002216.
STASZCZYK, A. (2019). European Parliament Position on EU Cyber Security and Defense Policy. In: Reality of Politics. Vol. 10, pp. 122–133.
SVEDSEN, Ø. (2019). Brexit and the future of EU defence: a practice approach to differentiated defense integration. In: Journal of European Integration. Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 993-1007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1622540.
TICHÝ, L. (2016). The EU Integration Discourse in the Energy Relations with Russia. In: Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 60-85.
YIN, R. K. (2009). Case study Research: design and methods. Applied social research methods series. Los Angeles: Sage Publishing.
Downloads
Published
2023-09-01
How to Cite
Filipec, O. (2023) “The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats: A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective”, Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, 23(1), pp. 27–55. doi: 10.34135/sjps.230102.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Please, read licence agreement.
Publication Charge
There is no publication fee or charge for any submitted or accepted articles. There is no article processing charges (APCs) would be billed to authors.
